PortfoliosLab logo
BEMB vs. ^GSPC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between BEMB and ^GSPC is 0.41, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BEMB vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BEMB:

1.02

^GSPC:

0.44

Sortino Ratio

BEMB:

1.50

^GSPC:

0.79

Omega Ratio

BEMB:

1.20

^GSPC:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

BEMB:

1.48

^GSPC:

0.48

Martin Ratio

BEMB:

4.63

^GSPC:

1.85

Ulcer Index

BEMB:

1.34%

^GSPC:

4.92%

Daily Std Dev

BEMB:

6.07%

^GSPC:

19.37%

Max Drawdown

BEMB:

-6.17%

^GSPC:

-56.78%

Current Drawdown

BEMB:

-1.19%

^GSPC:

-7.88%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BEMB achieves a 2.29% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's -3.77% return.


BEMB

YTD

2.29%

1M

2.71%

6M

0.90%

1Y

6.48%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

^GSPC

YTD

-3.77%

1M

7.44%

6M

-5.60%

1Y

8.37%

5Y*

14.12%

10Y*

10.46%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BEMB vs. ^GSPC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BEMB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BEMB is 8484
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BEMB is 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BEMB is 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BEMB is 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BEMB is 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BEMB is 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

^GSPC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ^GSPC is 6767
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ^GSPC is 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BEMB vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) and S&P 500 (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BEMB Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the ^GSPC Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BEMB and ^GSPC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Drawdowns

BEMB vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BEMB drawdown since its inception was -6.17%, smaller than the maximum ^GSPC drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BEMB and ^GSPC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

BEMB vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ishares J.P. Morgan Broad USD Emerging Markets Bond ETF (BEMB) is 2.53%, while S&P 500 (^GSPC) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that BEMB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...